<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Planet Sean &#187; Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.planetsean.com/category/search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.planetsean.com</link>
	<description>&#34;Life goes by pretty fast. If you don&#039;t stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it.&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:01:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Google Adds Privacy Link To Home Page</title>
		<link>http://www.planetsean.com/google-adds-privacy-link-to-home-page/</link>
		<comments>http://www.planetsean.com/google-adds-privacy-link-to-home-page/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 23:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetsean.com/google-adds-privacy-link-to-home-page/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last month, a handful of privacy groups urged Google to add a link to its privacy policy on its home page, in accordance with California law. Google said it interpreted the law differently. Google resisted doing so in part because every bit counts when determining how quickly its home page loads, given that load speed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last month, a handful of privacy groups <a href="http://www.privacyrights.org/ar/Google-HomePage-Alert-080603.htm#1" title="Google Privacy Rights">urged Google</a> to add a link to its privacy policy on its <a href="http://www.google.com/" title="Google Inc.">home page</a>, in accordance with California law.</p>
<p>Google said it interpreted the law differently.</p>
<p>Google resisted doing so in part because every bit counts when determining how quickly its home page loads, given that load speed and user satisfaction are strongly related. </p>
<p>The company probably also wanted to avoid giving outsiders the idea that they can force design changes by complaining.</p>
<p>In a <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/07/what-comes-next-in-this-series-13-33-53.html" title="Official Google Blog">blog post</a>, Marissa Mayer, VP of search products and user experience, said that Google co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin would agree to the change only if the number of the words on the home page (28) remained unchanged. So the word &#8220;Google&#8221; was dropped because it was implied.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Today we&#8217;re making a homepage change by adding a link to our privacy overview and policies,&#8221; said Mayer. &#8220;Google values our users&#8217; privacy first and foremost. Trust is the basis of everything we do, so we want you to be familiar and comfortable with the integrity and care we give your personal data. We added this link both to our homepage and to our results page to make it easier for you to find information about our privacy principles.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>So as we can all see, Google replaced the unnecessary &#8220;&#169;2008 Google&#8221; copyright notice at the bottom of its home page with a privacy link.</p>
<p>Though the copyright symbol and date remain, the bottom text now reads &#8220;&#169;2008 &#8211; <a href="http://www.google.com/intl/en/privacy.html" title="Google Privacy Statement">Privacy</a>.&#8221;</p>
<p>Well done, Google.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.planetsean.com/google-adds-privacy-link-to-home-page/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Retools BlackBerry Browser Support</title>
		<link>http://www.planetsean.com/google-retools-blackberry-browser-support/</link>
		<comments>http://www.planetsean.com/google-retools-blackberry-browser-support/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:44:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetsean.com/google-retools-blackberry-browser-support/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Starting today in the U.S., users of BlackBerry smartphones should begin noticing a number of improvements to their Google search results. Google has tailored its software to better accommodate the BlackBerry Web browser. Google has been on a roll lately with customized phone support. It goes to greater and greater lengths to make sure each [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Starting today in the U.S., users of BlackBerry smartphones should begin noticing a number of improvements to their Google search results. Google has tailored its software to better accommodate the BlackBerry Web browser.</p>
<p>Google has been on a roll lately with customized phone support. It goes to greater and greater lengths to make sure each mobile phone platform has what it needs to view and use Google&#8217;s mobile services better. </p>
<p>Google has, for example, rolled out some seriously customized versions of its services for the iPhone, which has different usability characteristics than many other phones. </p>
<p>Now, Google has turned its attention to BlackBerry users, specifically the browser.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://googlemobile.blogspot.com/2008/06/new-google-search-results-pages-for.html" title="New Google search results pages for BlackBerry users">Official Google Mobile Blog</a> spells out what it has done:</p>
<blockquote><ol>
<li><strong>Improved comprehensiveness:</strong> Our mobile search now incorporates results from Product Search, Blog Search, News archives search, and more.</li>
<li><strong>Blended results:</strong> Instead of showing you web, image, local and news results in separate sections, we now combine them to improve relevance. We&#8217;ve also made it easier for you to focus your search on any one of these categories &#8212; notice how the links are now placed at the top of the results page.</li>
<li><strong>Longer snippets:</strong> Web results include longer snippets so that your answer may be right on the results page.</li>
<li><strong>Related searches:</strong> At the bottom of the search results page, you&#8217;ll find a list of related searches to help you refine a query.</li>
</ol>
</blockquote>
<p>According to Google, these changes reflect its desktop search results pages. I was not able to test the new enhancements on my BlackBerry to confirm that. </p>
<p>Feel free to check it out for yourself and share your experience in the comments below.</p>
<p>You may also watch a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G_MLiJ-60ts" title="New Google mobile search results for BlackBerry browsers">video demonstration</a> here. </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.planetsean.com/google-retools-blackberry-browser-support/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Google Controls Search Quality</title>
		<link>http://www.planetsean.com/google-offers-peek-at-how-it-controls-search-quality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.planetsean.com/google-offers-peek-at-how-it-controls-search-quality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 15:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetsean.com/google-offers-peek-at-how-it-controls-search-quality/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google&#8217;s only goal: Improve user experience. How does it do that? According to Udi Manber, VP of engineering at Google, Search Quality, it is a heck of a lot of work. Google improves its search algorithms an average of nine times per week. Here&#8217;s why. Google&#8217;s Udi Manber published a massive blog post about what [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google&#8217;s only goal: Improve user experience. How does it do that? </p>
<p>According to Udi Manber, VP of engineering at Google, Search Quality, it is a heck of a lot of work. Google improves its search algorithms an average of nine times per week. Here&#8217;s why.</p>
<p>Google&#8217;s Udi Manber published <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/05/introduction-to-google-search-quality.html" title="Introduction to Google Search Quality">a massive blog post</a> about what exactly is going on behind Google&#8217;s closed doors. It is an interesting read. I invite you to check the entire post out <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/05/introduction-to-google-search-quality.html" title="Official Google Blog: Introduction to Google Search Quality">here</a>.</p>
<p>Below are some points I thought were most interesting. <span id="more-129"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>Search Quality is the name of the team responsible for the ranking of Google search results. Our job is clear: A few hundreds of millions of times a day people will ask Google questions, and within a fraction of a second Google needs to decide which among the billions of pages on the web to show them &#8212; and in what order&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>For something that is used so often by so many people, surprisingly little is known about ranking at Google. This is entirely our fault, and it is by design. We are, to be honest, quite secretive about what we do. There are two reasons for it: competition and abuse. Competition is pretty straightforward. No company wants to share its secret recipes with its competitors. As for abuse, if we make our ranking formulas too accessible, we make it easier for people to game the system. Security by obscurity is never the strongest measure, and we do not rely on it exclusively, but it does prevent a lot of abuse.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>The details of the ranking algorithms are in many ways Google&#8217;s crown jewels. We are very proud of them and very protective of them. By some estimate, more than one thousand programmer/scientist years have gone directly into their development, and the rate of innovation has not slowed down&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>The heart of the group is the team that works on core ranking. Ranking is hard, much harder than most people realize. One reason for this is that languages are inherently ambiguous, and documents do not follow any set of rules. There are really no standards for how to convey information, so we need to be able to understand all web pages, written by anyone, for any reason. And that&#8217;s just half of the problem. We also need to understand the queries people pose, which are on average fewer than three words, and map them to our understanding of all documents. Not to mention that different people have different needs. And we have to do all of that in a few milliseconds.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>The most famous part of our ranking algorithm is PageRank, an algorithm developed by Larry Page and Sergey Brin, who founded Google. PageRank is still in use today, but it is now a part of a much larger system. Other parts include language models (the ability to handle phrases, synonyms, diacritics, spelling mistakes, and so on), query models (it&#8217;s not just the language, it&#8217;s how people use it today), time models (some queries are best answered with a 30-minutes old page, and some are better answered with a page that stood the test of time), and personalized models (not all people want the same thing).</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Another team in our group is responsible for evaluating how well we&#8217;re doing. This is done in many different ways, but the goal is always the same: improve the user experience. This is not the main goal, it is the only goal. There are automated evaluations every minute (to make sure nothing goes wrong), periodic evaluations of our overall quality, and, most importantly, evaluations of specific algorithmic improvements. When an engineer gets a new idea and develops a new algorithm, we test their ideas thoroughly. We have a team of statisticians who look at all the data and determine the value of the new idea. We meet weekly (sometimes twice a week) to go over those new ideas and approve new launches. In 2007, we launched more than 450 new improvements, about 9 per week on the average&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s amazing that Google can roll out so many updates to its core product with essentially no one (okay, except for maybe Google engineers) noticing. </p>
<p>Manber goes on to talk about Google&#8217;s focus on International search, and its dedication to new features and new user interfaces. Let&#8217;s not forget its spam prevention team.</p>
<p>Manber says this introduction is going to be followed up by more posts that explain how Google attains its search quality, though he didn&#8217;t mention how frequently.</p>
<p>It is Google&#8217;s dedication to improving search that has placed it at the top of the heap. It&#8217;s clear that Google takes the idea of search very seriously, and is committed to helping people find what they need as fast as possible.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.planetsean.com/google-offers-peek-at-how-it-controls-search-quality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Pirate &#8211; Time To Plunder</title>
		<link>http://www.planetsean.com/google-pirate-time-to-plunder/</link>
		<comments>http://www.planetsean.com/google-pirate-time-to-plunder/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 05:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.planetsean.com/google-pirate-time-to-plunder/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Doing some research on Pirates this evening, I stumbled upon an interesting gem of a website called Google Pirate. The concept behind the site? Use the power of Google to scour every corner of the internet for exactly what you need: I got a fever! And the only prescription.. is more cowbell! This is definitely [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doing some research on Pirates this evening, I stumbled upon an interesting gem of a website called <a href="http://www.googlepirate.com/" title="Google Pirate">Google Pirate</a>.</p>
<p>The concept behind the site? Use the power of <a href="http://www.google.com/" title="Google">Google</a> to scour every corner of the internet for exactly what you need:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.googlepirate.com/" title="Google Pirate"><img class="center" src="http://www.planetsean.com/images/post-art/google-pirate.jpg" alt="Google Pirate" /></a></p>
<p>I got a fever! And the only prescription.. is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/More_cowbell" title="Bruce Dickinson: More Cowbell">more cowbell</a>!</p>
<p>This is definitely a useful website for many reasons&#8230; but before you fear (the reaper) getting your &#8220;Arrr&#8221; on, take a look at the legal disclaimer from the Google Pirate website: </p>
<blockquote><p>This website is completely compliant with the <acronym title="Digital Millenium Copyright Act">DMCA</acronym>. Before you send off emails, be aware that this site has a legal use and does not condone copyright infringement or intellectual theft in any way. This website does not contain any illegal material, nor does it even contain direct links to illegal material. It is designed using Google&#8217;s Custom Search tools to narrow search results down to filetypes to remove unwanted sites that aren&#8217;t related to the client&#8217;s search.</p>
<p>This website is not affiliated with Google. &#8220;Google&#8221; is a trademarked name of Google Inc. &#8220;Google Pirate&#8221; is not a trademark name/url and is only named such due to the relevancy of the word Google.</p>
<p>The use of the word &#8220;Pirate&#8221; does not imply that we condone piracy. Its simply because we think pirates are awesome.</p></blockquote>
<p>I completely agree, Pirates are awesome and in times like this, I remember the words of Bruce Dickinson:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Easy, guys&#8230; I put my pants on just like the rest of you &#8211; one leg at a time. Except, once my pants are on, I make gold records.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m telling you &#8211; you&#8217;re gonna want that cowbell on the track! Babies.. before we&#8217;re done here.. y&#8217;all be wearing gold-plated diapers.</p>
<p>What does that mean you&#8217;re asking yourself? Never question Bruce Dickinson! Roll it! </p>
<p>In Memoriam: Gene Frenkle: 1950-2000</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.planetsean.com/google-pirate-time-to-plunder/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
